News-jacking…. right or wrong?
Posted by Team @ The PR Workshop
In the armor of public relations professionals all across the globe, news-jacking has indeed arrived.
By now there are a handful of examples, as to how the alert and agile communications professionals can plug in his brand with any real-time news to get a viral visibility – in a sense, an exponential brand visibility which no other conventional tool in the PR armor can ever bring in. This lucid post by PR thought leader David Meerman Scott informs about the what, where, how and when of news-jacking. For any aspiring news-jacker, Davids latest book on the subject is a must read.
To quote from a popular post – you news-jack on virality… that’s what any smart communications pro does – take something that’s already gone viral, and piggyback on its success by creating your own awesome spin on it. There are several companies out there who have done it — and done it well.
Move on now to the debate on what is right and wrong in news jacking. Some of the most popular brands in the US have now started to gain a tangible brand-lift by news-jacking the presidential elections. But, what is beginning to generate a debate now on the virtues and vices of news-jacking is Hurricane Sandy, that has battered the east coast of USA, causing huge damage to people and property.
Brands – as diverse as from careers to cosmetics, and essential supply services lost no time in jumping into the news-jacking band-wagon!
But is it right for brands to look at promoting themselves, by plugging them in the visibility that a monstrous disaster like Sandy gets in the social world? The answer for this can be – yes, only when your brand is placed well to serve the essentials for the people who have been tormented by the storm. And no, if your brand intention is to just exploit the visibility, but has nothing to do with the aftermath of the event!
Extending that, its fine if you are a utility or essential service provider for your brand to be plugged in. But if you are a hair-do company, or a cosmetic (like the one suggesting to spend your home time trying a new product of theirs!), then news-jacking will be a fail in the long run. What are your views? You think a hair do company must news-jack Hurricane Sandy?
Related articles
- “Newsjacking” – a Good Idea with Some Dangerous Pitfalls (doughaslam.com)
- Is Newsjacking Hurricane Sandy Right or Wrong? (hubspot.com)
- How a 9-Year Old Successfully Newsjacked the GOP Primary (hubspot.com)
- Is Newsjacking Hurricane Sandy Right or Wrong? (rpmgr.com)
Share this:
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Related
About Team @ The PR Workshop
Communications professional, PR practitioner, HR & Talent acquisition pro. Love & live by working on customer centric co-created and do-able communication strategies across platforms! Live in Chennai, IndiaPosted on November 3, 2012, in brand, communication, communications outreach pro, information integrity, PR, socialchampion, socmed and tagged Brand, corpcomm, crisisPR, David Meerman Scott, HubSpot, Hurricane Sandy, newsjacking, public relations, social-media, socmed, spokesman, strategy execution. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.
Pingback: On the when of news-jacking! | Public Relations Equity.